WATTS v. HOLLAND

No. 11127.

153 F.2d 337 (1946)

WATTS et ux. v. HOLLAND et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied March 18, 1946.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alfred J. Harwood, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellants.

W. P. Rich and Richard H. Fuidge, both of Marysville, Cal., and Chas. A. Cantwell, of Reno, Nev., for appellees.

Before DENMAN, STEPHENS, and BONE, Circuit Judges.


DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the District Court in a suit for an accounting and disposition of alleged partnership assets, holding that appellant was entitled to neither.

The amended complaint as permitted by Rule 15(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, described two alternative relationships between the parties. The first alleged a transfer on October 25, 1940, by appellant George C. Watts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases