ROBINSON'S WOMEN'S APPAREL v. UNION B. & T. CO.


67 F.Supp. 395 (1946)

ROBINSON'S WOMEN'S APPAREL, Inc., v. UNION BANK & TRUST CO. OF LOS ANGELES et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

August 30, 1946.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Poletti, Diamond, Rabin, Freidin & Mackay, of New York City (Alfred B. Nathan, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Burke & Burke, of New York City (J. Frederic Taylor and Coleman Burke, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.


RIFKIND, District Judge.

The agreement between plaintiff, as buyer, and Joseph Haft, as seller, provided that, in the event of a named contingency, the price, or the unpaid balance thereof, shall be paid to a third party, Abby Joy Haft. Were the agreement so drawn that the named contingency were the marriage of Abby Joy Haft or the death of a stranger to the contract, there is no question but that under California law the third party beneficiary could, upon the occurrence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases