LEWALD v. YORK CORPORATION


68 F.Supp. 386 (1946)

LEWALD et al. v. YORK CORPORATION.

District Court, S. D. New York.

October 21, 1946.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph Rogers, of New York City, for plaintiffs.

Gould & Wilkie, of New York City, and Townsend, Elliott & Munson, of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.


RIFKIND, District Judge.

Defendant moves to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the subject matter is such that the court should not assume jurisdiction. It invokes the rule of forum non conveniens.

The action is by three preferred stockholders of York Ice Machinery Corporation, a Delaware corporation, now merged with defendant, another Delaware corporation, to determine whether such stockholders, who had dissented from the merger and had demanded payment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases