1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 153 F.2d
  5. 153 F.2d 121 (1946)
 

SPECIAL EQUIPMENT CO. v. OOMS

No. 8466.

153 F.2d 121 (1946)

SPECIAL EQUIPMENT CO. v. OOMS.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia.

Decided January 14, 1946.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Harold W. Norman, of Chicago, Ill., of the bar of the State of Illinois, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Curtis F. Prangley and Ballard Moore, both of Chicago, Ill., and James M. Graves, of Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. J. Harold Kilcoyne, of Washington, D. C., also entered an appearance for appellant.

Mr. E. L. Reynolds, of Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. W. W. Cochran, Solicitor, United States Patent Office, of Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellee.

Before GRONER, C. J., and EDGERTON and CLARK, JJ.

EDGERTON, Associate Justice.

Appellant's suit to obtain a patent1 was dismissed by the District Court. That court agreed with the Patent Office that the appealed claims were misleading and incomplete and failed to point out the invention. These were the principal issues raised by the pleadings. On appeal this court did not decide these issues but affirmed the District Court's judgment on a wholly different ground.2

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases