1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 157 F.2d
  5. 157 F.2d 75 (1946)
 

TEICHMANN v. PARRISH

No. 9173.

157 F.2d 75 (1946)

TEICHMANN v. PARRISH.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia.

Decided June 28, 1946.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. J. Harry Welch, of Washington, D. C. with whom Mr. H. Mason Welch, of Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant. Messrs. Samuel B. Block and John R. Daily, both of Washington, D. C., also entered appearances for appellant.

Mr. Robert H. McNeill, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, WILBUR K. MILLER and PRETTYMAN, Associate Justices.

PER CURIAM.

Appellee has recovered damages for alleged negligent treatment administered to her by or under the direction of appellant as a physician. The evidence was conflicting. The principal question is whether the evidence favorable to appellee, if believed, supports the verdict. We find that it does. Appellant's other assignments of error are also without merit.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases