DUNKLY v. ERICH

No. 11265.

158 F.2d 1 (1946)

DUNKLY et al. v. ERICH et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied December 20, 1946.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles A. Christin and Thomas J. Keegan, both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Philip C. Wilkins, of Sacramento, Cal., and Hardin Barry, of Susanville, Cal., for appellee.

Before GARRECHT, HEALY, and BONE, Circuit Judges.


BONE, Circuit Judge.

The appellants are engaged in the raising of rainbow and brook trout. They own a leasehold interest in certain real property whereon they maintain artificial ponds supplied with water from springs upon the premises. In these ponds appellants place fertilized trout eggs (which they purchase already fertilized from another hatchery), hatch the eggs, and raise the trout to a marketable size. The trout are then killed, dressed, placed in refrigerating...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases