1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 69 F.Supp.
  5. 69 F.Supp. 58 (1946)
 

PORTER v. RUSHLIGHT & CO.

Civil Action No. 3288.

69 F.Supp. 58 (1946)

PORTER, Price Administrator, v. A. G. RUSHLIGHT & CO.

District Court, D. Oregon.

November 6, 1946.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Francis E. Harrington, Dist. Enforcement Atty., W. A. Stockman and Joseph J. Labodie, Enforcement Attys., and J. Robert Patterson, Asst. U. S. Atty., all of Portland, Or., for plaintiff.

Charles C. Hall and Lloyd V. Weiser, both of Portland, Or., for defendant.

McCOLLOCH, District Judge.

This case is controlled by Porter v. Roach, D.C., 69 F.Supp. 56, where I held, on the authority of Cudahy Packing Co. v. Holland, 315 U.S. 357, 62 S.Ct. 651, 86 L.Ed. 895, that the Price Administrator could not re-delegate his price fixing powers to a Regional Administrator. Both cases arise under RMPR No. 251. While the Roach case involved the right of the Regional Administrator...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases