1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 70 F.Supp.
  5. 70 F.Supp. 53 (1946)
 

UNITED STATES v. PARAMOUNT PICTURES

70 F.Supp. 53 (1946)

UNITED STATES v. PARAMOUNT PICTURES, Inc., et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

As Modified February 3, 1947.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Simpson, Thacher & Bartlett, of New York City, for defendant Paramount.

Davis, Polk, Wardwell, Sunderland & Kiendl, of New York City, for defendant Loew's.

Donovan, Leisure, Newton, Lumbard & Irvine, of New York City, for defendant RKO.

Joseph M. Proskauer, of New York City, for defendant Warner.

Dwight, Harris, Koegel & Caskey, of New York City, for defendant 20th Century Fox.

Before AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge, and GODDARD and BRIGHT, District Judges.

DECREE.

PER CURIAM.

The court having rendered its opinion herein on June 11, 1946, 66 F.Supp. 323, having duly considered the proposals of the parties and of amici curiæ as to its findings and judgment, and having filed its findings of fact and conclusions of law, wherein certain of the defendants herein were found to have violated the Act of Congress approved July 2,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases