COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. HOWARD C. PLATT TRUST

Nos. 11296-11305.

154 F.2d 1016 (1946)

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. HOWARD C. PLATT TRUST, Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co., Trustee, Respondent. SAME v. ESTATE of E. B. F. TIBBITS, Dec'd, James A. Folger & Robert W. Miller, Ex'rs, Respondent. SAME v. J. A. FOLGER, Respondent. SAME v. Peter Folger, Respondent. SAME v. JOHN M. & Edith P. CUNNINGHAM TRUST, J. A. Folger & Peter Folger, Trustees, Respondent. SAME v. ESTATE of C. E. L. FOLGER, Dec'd, J. A. Folger & Peter Folger, Ex'rs, Respondent. SAME v. Evelyn C. DONOHOE, Respondent. SAME v. ELIZABETH MOFFITT FOLGER TRUST, American Trust Company and Robert Watt Miller, Trustees, Respondent. SAME v. Gladys Platt PENDLETON, Respondent. SAME v. Genevieve C. KENT, Respondent.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

April 16, 1946.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sewall Key, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., and J. P. Wenchel, Chief Counsel, B. I. R., of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Oscar Samuels and Tevis Jacobs, both of San Francisco, Cal., for respondent Howard C. Platt Trust.

Marshall P. Madison, Sigvald Nielson, and Harry R. Harrow, all of San Francisco, Cal., for respondents Estate of E. B. F. Tibbits and Elizabeth Moffitt Folger Trust.

Howard J. Finn, Theodore R. Meyer, and Robert H. Walker, all of San Francisco, Cal., for respondents J. A. Folger, Peter Folger, John M. & Edith P. Cunningham Trust, Estate of C. E. L. Folger, deceased, and Gladys Platt Pendleton.

Walter C. Fox, Jr., of San Francisco, Cal., for respondent Evelyn C. Donohoe and Genevieve C. Kent.

Before GARRECHT, DENMAN, and BONE, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the stipulations of counsel for respective parties, filed in each of above causes, for dismissal of the petition for review in each cause, and good cause therefor appearing, it is ordered that the petition for review in each of above causes be dismissed, that a judgment be filed in each cause and recorded in the minutes of this Court accordingly, and that the mandate of this Court in each cause issue...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases