RANDOLPH v. MISSOURI-KANSAS-TEXAS R. CO.

No. 4211.

68 F.Supp. 1007 (1946)

RANDOLPH et al. v. MISSOURI-KANSAS-TEXAS R. CO. et al.

District Court, W. D. Missouri, W. D.

Supplemental Opinion November 22, 1946.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clif Langsdale and Clyde Taylor, both of Kansas City, Mo., for plaintiff.

Cooper, Neel, Sutherland & Rogers, of Kansas City, Mo., G. H. Penland and M. E. Clinton, both of Dallas, Tex., and C. S. Burg and Carl S. Hoffman, both of St. Louis, Mo., for defendants Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co. and Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co. of Texas.

Tucker, Murphy & Wilson, of Kansas City, Mo., for defendant Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen.


REEVES, District Judge.

Whatever the designation of the motions or other pleadings filed by the defendants in the above entitled cause, the pervading thought is that the court is without jurisdiction. It is the opinion of able counsel that the questions involved are subject to determination under the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., and by various administrative tribunals created thereby.

A proper approach to the solution of the question...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases