ROSENBERG v. EQUITABLE TRUST CO.

Civ. A. No. 486.

68 F.Supp. 991 (1946)

ROSENBERG v. EQUITABLE TRUST CO.

District Court, D. Delaware.

December 5, 1946.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William H. Foulk and Herbert L. Cobin, both of Wilmington, Del., for plaintiff.

James R. Morford and Thomas Cooch (of Marvel & Morford), both of Wilmington, Del., for defendant.


LEAHY, District Judge.

Despite the factual debris and the elaborate arguments of counsel on contract law,1 the issues are simple. What was intended to be the exchange for Mrs. Bradford's promise to leave her nephew $20,000? There are three possibilities. First, the parties may have intended that she receive nothing for her promise, or, in other words, that she intended a gift to Rogers. Second...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases