BLAND, Associate Judge.
Having allowed claims 13 and 14 (all the claims in the case except those involved in this appeal), the Primary Examiner of the United States Patent Office rejected claims 12, 15, 16, 17, and 18 of appellant's application for a patent in view of the prior art cited, and his decision was affirmed by the Board of Appeals. From the decision of the latter, appellant here petitions for its review.
Claim 12, in view of explanations hereinafter...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
