1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 59 F.Supp.
  5. 59 F.Supp. 21 (1945)
 

THOMPSON v. BALTIMORE & O. R. CO.

No. 2456.

59 F.Supp. 21 (1945)

THOMPSON et al. v. BALTIMORE & O. R. CO. et al.

District Court, E. D. Missouri, E. D.

February 2, 1945.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

B. F. Batts, H. H. Larimore, S. G. Ray, and M. G. Roberts, all of St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiffs.

Douglas F. Smith, Kenneth F. Burgess, and Robert A. Sprecher, all of Chicago, Ill., Wilton D. Chapman and E. C. Hartman, both of St. Louis, Mo., Guernsey Orcutt, of Philadelphia, Pa., T. P. Healy, of New York City, and George C. Doering, of Baltimore, Md., for defendants.

HULEN, District Judge.

By this action, the railroads who are plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment holding that by virtue of a certain written instrument known as "Joint Division Sheet No. 200-A" the railroads, parties to this action, are required to make a division of rates or revenue resulting from land grant shipments on the basis of the percentages set out in "Joint Division Sheet No. 200-A". The defendants by answer, in effect, pray for a declaratory judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases