VALENTINE & SONS v. BOWLES

No. 155.

151 F.2d 343 (1945)

VALENTINE & SONS et al. v. BOWLES, Price Administrator.

United States Emergency Court of Appeals.

Decided September 26, 1945.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Emmett R. Burns, of San Francisco, Cal., for complainants.

John Harman, Regional Price Atty., of San Francisco, Cal. (Richard H. Field, Gen. Counsel, Nathaniel L. Nathanson, Associate Gen. Counsel, Jacob D. Hyman, Chief, Court Review Price Branch, and Louis L. Rochmes, Atty., and Josephine H. Klein, Atty., all of the Office of Price Administration, all of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for respondent.

Before MARIS, Chief Judge, and MAGRUDER and McALLISTER, Judges.


Heard at San Francisco June 6, 1945.

MAGRUDER, Judge.

The complaint in the present case is directed against the Price Administrator's refusal, upon a petition under the adjustment provision of a price regulation, to make a retroactive increase in the maximum permissible charges for apple drying services.

Commercial apple drying services were first, on April 28, 1942, brought under price regulation by the General Maximum Price Regulation (7 F. R. 3153...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases