1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 62 F.Supp.
  5. 62 F.Supp. 401 (1945)
 

HAVEY v. UNITED STATES

No. 45993.

62 F.Supp. 401 (1945)

HAVEY v. UNITED STATES.

Court of Claims.

October 1, 1945.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fred W. Shields, of Washington, D. C. (King & King, of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for plaintiff.

Robert Burstein, of Washington, D. C., and Francis M. Shea, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant.

Ralph H. Case, of Washington, D. C., amicus curiae.

Before WHALEY, Chief Justice, and LITTLETON, WHITAKER, JONES, and MADDEN, Judges.

MADDEN, Judge.

The plaintiff is an enlisted man of the United States Navy who was retired prior to June 1, 1942, the date as of which the provisions of the Pay Readjustment Act of 1942, Act of June 16, 1942, 56 Stat. 359, 37 U.S.C.A. § 101 et seq., became applicable. That act was a comprehensive overhauling of the entire pay system of all of the armed forces. It increased the pay of many classes of persons, especially enlisted men. It provided in Section 15 that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases