1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 89 F.Supp.
  5. 89 F.Supp. 316 (1945)
 

UNITED STATES v. FORESTAL LAND, TIMBER & RAILWAYS

89 F.Supp. 316 (1945)

UNITED STATES v. FORESTAL LAND, TIMBER & RAILWAYS, Limited, et al.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

Supplemental Opinion March 22, 1945.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence S. Aspey, New York City, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., for the United States.

White & Case, New York City, for defendant Carl B. Ely.

Willkie, Owen, Otis, Farr & Gallagher, New York City, for defendant Int'l Products Corporation.

Kaye, Scholer, Fierman & Hays, New York City, for defendant Charles J. Vermilye.

Mark W. Norman, New York City, for defendant E. Hope Norton.

Debevoise, Stevenson, Plimpton & Page, New York City, for defendants Tannin Products Corporation & Tannin Corporation.

CAFFEY, District Judge.

I think it plain that, if lawful, it would be desirable and just that Tannin Products Export Corporation be brought into the instant action as a defendant. If the transactions described in the supplemental complaint had occurred after the commencement of the action (on December 20, 1943) it is clear that joining Tannin Export would be lawful, Subdivision (d) of Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.; United States v. Bates...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases