United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued January 29, 1945.
Decided February 12, 1945.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Mr. Orville N. Greene, of New York City, with whom Mr. Karl W. Flocks, of Washington, D. C., was on the brief for appellant. Mr. S. Michael Pineles, of New York City, also entered an appearance for appellant.
Mr. E. L. Reynolds, United States Patent Office, of Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. W. W. Cochran, Solicitor, United States Patent Office, of Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellee.
Before MILLER, EDGERTON and ARNOLD, Associate Justices.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia.
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing a complaint brought to secure a patent under Section 4915 R.S.1 Appellant has designed a method of lighting which eliminates glare. It consists of putting a polarizer in front of the light and arranging the lamp so that the rays fall on the surface to be illuminated at an angle of between twenty and seventy degrees. The utility of placing a polarizer in front of a source of light...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.