1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 66 F.Supp.
  5. 66 F.Supp. 239 (1945)
 

HANKISON v. UNITED STATES

Civ. Nos. 5098, 5124.

66 F.Supp. 239 (1945)

HANKISON v. UNITED STATES.

District Court, N. D. Ohio, W. D.

August 17, 1945.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wilbur E. Benoy, of Columbus, Ohio, and William E. Orthwein, of Toledo, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Don C. Miller, U. S. Atty., of Cleveland, Ohio, Gerald P. Openlander, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Toledo, Ohio, and Fred J. Neuland, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., for defendant.

KLOEB, District Judge.

In view of the excellent statement of facts contained in defendant's brief (pp. 4 to 13, both incls.), filed May 31, 1945, and of the Stipulation of Agreed Facts filed April 25, 1945, wherein it appears that the material facts involved are not disputed, the Court will attempt no re-statement of facts in this memorandum.

The first question for determination is whether plaintiff's claim for refund, filed July 10, 1944, was filed within...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases