1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 143 F.2d
  5. 143 F.2d 602 (1944)
 

AUTOMATIC FIRE ALARM CO. v. BOWLES

No. 105.

143 F.2d 602 (1944)

AUTOMATIC FIRE ALARM CO. et al. v. BOWLES, Price Administrator.

United States Emergency Court of Appeals.

Decided July 3, 1944.

As Amended July 26, 1944.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Irving Smith, Jr., of New York City, for complainants.

Ernest R. Mortenson, Atty., and Jacob D. Hyman, Chief Court Review Price Branch, Office of Price Administration, both of Washington, D. C. (Richard H. Field, Acting Gen. Counsel, Nathaniel L. Nathanson, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Benjamin Chapman, Atty., and Josephine H. Klein, Atty., all of the Office of Price Administration, all of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for respondent.

Before MARIS, Chief Judge, and MAGRUDER and LAWS, Judges.

Heard at New York, April 3, 1944.

MARIS, Chief Judge.

The complainants are three corporations engaged in New York, Philadelphia and Boston, respectively, in the business of rendering fire alarm protective service. One of them also furnishes burglar alarm service.

On August 4, 1943, the Price Administrator amended Section 1499.101(c) of Maximum Price Regulation No. 165 — Services, by adding to the services to which the Regulation applies the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases