McCULLOUGH v. CORPORATION

No. 9957.

143 F.2d 595 (1944)

McCULLOUGH v. KAMMERER CORPORATION et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 1, 1944.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R. Welton Whann, of Los Angeles, Cal., and A. W. Boyken, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Lyon & Lyon, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before DENMAN, MATHEWS, and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

In his petition for rehearing appellant has cited Kellogg No. 657,777, Hill No. 1,338,773, and Segelhorst No. 1,599,067 and No. 1,767,018 as being demonstrative of anticipation of Reilly-Stone No. 1,625,391. We do not find in these patents such anticipation.

The petition for rehearing is denied.

MATHEWS, Circuit Judge...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases