1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 69 F.Supp.
  5. 69 F.Supp. 429 (1944)
 

PANGBORN CORP. v. AMERICAN FOUNDRY EQUIPMENT CO.

Civil Action No. 193.

69 F.Supp. 429 (1944)

PANGBORN CORPORATION v. AMERICAN FOUNDRY EQUIPMENT CO.

District Court, D. Delaware.

November 17, 1944.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William S. Potter, of Southerland, Berl & Potter, all of Wilmington, Del., and William F. Hall, of Hall & Houghton, all of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Hugh M. Morris, of Morris, Steele, Nichols & Arsht, all of Washington, Del., for defendant.

GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.

Findings of Fact.

1. On January 8, 1940, Pangborn Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Pangborn," filed its complaint in this Court against The American Foundry Equipment Company, hereinafter referred to as "American".

2. In its complaint Pangborn alleged, inter alia, the ownership by it of Rosenberger and Keefer application for United States Letters Patent, Serial No. 726,188,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases