IN RE BLAIR

Patent Appeal No. 4866.

142 F.2d 289 (1944)

In re BLAIR.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

April 4, 1944.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Baldwin & Wight, of Washington, D. C. (Donald M. Wight, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant.

W. W. Cochran, of Washington, D. C. (R. F. Whitehead, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Before GARRETT, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, LENROOT, and JACKSON, Associate Judges.


BLAND, Associate Judge.

Claims 24 and 25 having been allowed by the tribunals of the United States Patent Office in appellant's application for a patent, the Primary Examiner rejected claims 2, 8, 20, 21, 22, and 23 thereof, and appeal has been taken here from the decision of the Board of Appeals affirming that of the examiner.

Appellant's application relates to luminous discharge lamps, which appellant states are intended for use in connection with photographic...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases