NICHOLSON v. ERSTEIN

Civil Action No. 341.

59 F.Supp. 352 (1944)

NICHOLSON v. ERSTEIN.

District Court, W. D. Michigan, S. D.

February 10, 1944.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry D. Reber, William J. Branstrom, and J. Donald Murphy, all of Fremont, Mich., for plaintiff.

McCobb & Heaney, of Grand Rapids, Mich. (Fred C. Wetmore, of Grand Rapids, Mich., of counsel), for defendant.


RAYMOND, District Judge.

The accompanying findings of fact and conclusions of law make an extended opinion unnecessary. The controlling question is one of fact, namely, what agreement was entered into between plaintiff's decedent and defendant with reference to the settlement of Mary Russell Foote's claim against the estate of Benard Erstein, deceased?

Plaintiff claims that the agreement between the parties is contained in Exhibit 4 (see findings, paragraph...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases