PER CURIAM.
Appellant was convicted with others of the crime of illicit distilling; and the sole question presented by the appeal is whether there was sufficient evidence of guilt on his part to take the case to the jury. For reasons adequately set forth in the opinion of the District Judge denying appellant's motion for a new trial, we think that the evidence was sufficient.
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.