HACKEL v. LEYTUS

Civil Action No. 2262.

57 F.Supp. 277 (1944)

HACKEL v. LEYTUS.

District Court, W. D. Pennsylvania.

October 11, 1944.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Schlesinger & Schlesinger, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff.

Henry Kauffman and M. D. Wedner, both of Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant.


GIBSON, District Judge.

After verdict for defendant the plaintiff has moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial.

The plaintiff's complaint was based upon two promissory notes, one for $1,500 and the other for $2,500. After it developed that plaintiff had paid the bank holding the $2,500 note only a part of the amount due, his counsel elected to proceed upon the $1,500 note, which was in the possession of complainant as its payee.<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases