1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 145 F.2d
  5. 145 F.2d 991 (1944)
 

CLEVELAND PUNCH & SHEAR WORKS CO. v. E. W. BLISS CO.

Nos. 9748-9751.

145 F.2d 991 (1944)

CLEVELAND PUNCH & SHEAR WORKS CO. v. E. W. BLISS CO. et al. SAME v. MARQUETTE TOOL & MFG. CO. SAME v. E. W. BLISS CO. et al. E. W. BLISS CO. et al. v. CLEVELAND PUNCH & SHEAR WORKS CO.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

December 7, 1944.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Victor D. Borst, of New York City, for Cleveland Punch & Shear Works Co.

Albert R. Golrick, of Cleveland, Ohio (Horace B. Fay and Albert R. Golrick, both of Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for E. W. Bliss Co., Toledo Machine & Tool Co., Frederich J. Rode, and Marquette Tool Mfg. Co.

Before HICKS, SIMONS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

SIMONS, Circuit Judge.

Since patents in all four cases relate to drawing presses for shaping large sheet metal structures such as the roofs, fenders, and body panels of automobiles, and since the patents are owned by the Bliss Company and its affiliates, and the alleged infringer is the same in each of the cases, economy of time and space will be served by disposing of them in a single opinion, although they were briefed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases