The Osbornes, appellants herein, were in possession of a contiguous area of stock grazing land consisting of land owned by them, land leased by them, and land in the Kaibab National Forest under permit (36 Code of Federal Regulations, § 231.9) issued to them. Before the institution of this litigation the national forest land under permit was declared appropriated for military purposes.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
OSBORNE v. UNITED STATES
No. 10755.
145 F.2d 892 (1944)
OSBORNE et al. v. UNITED STATES.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
November 24, 1944.
November 24, 1944.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Woolf & Shute, of Phoenix, Ariz., for appellants.
Norman M. Littell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Frank E. Flynn, U. S. Atty., and Charles A. Carson, Sp. Atty., Dept. of Justice, all of Phoenix, Ariz., and Vernon L. Wilkinson and S. Billingsley Hill, Attys., Dept. of Justice, both of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before DENMAN, STEPHENS, and HEALY, Circuit judges.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
