1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 55 F.Supp.
  5. 55 F.Supp. 39 (1943)
 

BELDING HEMINWAY CO. v. FUTURE FASHIONS

55 F.Supp. 39 (1943)

BELDING HEMINWAY CO. v. FUTURE FASHIONS, Inc., et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

August 2, 1943.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dwight, Harris, Koegel & Caskey, of New York City (Frederick W. P. Lorenzen, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Charles Sonnenreich, of New York City, for defendant Future Fashions, Inc.

BRIGHT, District Judge.

Plaintiff seeks an injunction pendente lite restraining the defendant from advertising or offering for sale, or taking or filling orders for the sale or delivery, of dress goods claimed to infringe plaintiff's design patent No. 134490.

The patented design consists of three rows of daisy like figures, each interlocking with the other, the petals on the two outer rows being of a white or light color with a dark center row of much the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases