REMBERT v. COE

No. 8185.

136 F.2d 793 (1943)

REMBERT et al. v. COE, Com'r of Patents.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

Decided June 14, 1943.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Clair W. Fairbank, of New York City, with whom Messrs. Virgil C. Kline, and Harry A. Mitman, both of New York City, and Lee B. Kemon, of Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. W. W. Cochran, Solicitor, United States Patent Office, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before SOPER, Circuit Judge, sitting by designation, and MILLER and VINSON, Associate Justices.


MILLER, Associate Justice.

The Patent Office denied the application of Rembert and Jenkins for a patent upon a cementitious composition and article, and for the method of making them. In a proceeding under Revised Statutes, Section 4915,1 the District Court decided that nothing recited in appellants' claims amounts to an invention over the prior art; and dismissed the complaint.

On this appeal, the utility and commercial success...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases