1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 51 F.Supp.
  5. 51 F.Supp. 859 (1943)
 

WESTERN STATES MACH. CO. v. S. S. HEPWORTH CO.

Nos. 1544, 1636.

51 F.Supp. 859 (1943)

WESTERN STATES MACH. CO. v. S. S. HEPWORTH CO.

District Court, E. D. New York.

Supplementary Opinion October 6, 1943.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hammond & Littell, of New York City (Albert C. Johnston and Nelson Littell, both of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Howson & Howson, of New York City (Charles H. Howson, of Philadelphia, Pa., and W. F. Sonnekalb, Jr., of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

BYERS, District Judge.

These causes, consolidated for trial, present conventional issues of infringement and validity of five patents, three of which deal with mechanism to control the successive purging, washing and drying of sugar in centrifugal machines in sugar refineries and factories; the remaining two cover, respectively, a syrup separator, and a water cooled brake. These devices promote the successful accomplishment of the tasks of the contrifugal machines...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases