1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 135 F.2d
  5. 135 F.2d 741 (1943)
 

MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. PROTECTIVE COMMITTEE FOR MISSOURI PACIFIC FIRST AND REFUNDING MORTGAGE BONDS

Nos. 12130-12136.

135 F.2d 741 (1943)

MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Debtor, v. PROTECTIVE COMMITTEE FOR MISSOURI PACIFIC FIRST AND REFUNDING MORTGAGE BONDS et al. Charles H. THORTON et al., Appellants, v. SAME. William Carnegie EWEN, as Chairman, et al., Appellants, v. SAME. COMMERCIAL NATIONAL BANK & TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK, as Successor Trustee, etc., Appellant, v. SAME. ST. LOUIS UNION TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee, etc., et al., Appellants, v. SAME. Edward C. DELAFIELD et al., Appellants, v. SAME. Gerald AXELROD et al., Appellants, v. SAME.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

May 8, 1943.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marion B. Pierce, of New York City, and John L. Oliver, of Cape Girardeau, Mo., for appellant in No. 12130.

Luther M. Walter, of Chicago, Ill., for appellants in No. 12131.

Everett Paul Griffin, of St. Louis, Mo., Kenneth McEwen, of New York City, and Edward F. Colladay, of Washington, D. C., for appellants in No. 12132.

Owen D. Nee and William P. Palmer, both of New York City, for appellant in No. 12133.

R. H. McRoberts, of St. Louis, Mo., for appellants in No. 12134.

Sanford H. E. Freund and Douglas B. Steimle, both of New York City, for appellants in No. 12135.

Harry Kirshbaum, of New York City, and Edwin J. Bean, of St. Louis, Mo., for appellants in No. 12136.

W. Lloyd Kitchel, of New York City, Jacob Chasnoff, of St. Louis, Mo., Daniel W. Knowlton and Emmet McCaffery, both of Washington, D. C., Robert D. Evans, of St. Louis, Mo., Claude E. Hamilton, Jr., of Washington, D. C., James L. Homire and Fred N. Oliver, both of New York City, John C. Donnally, of Washington, D. C., Leonard D. Adkins, of New York City, and S. Mayner Wallace, of St. Louis, Mo., for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appeals remanded to District Court for purpose of holding hearing on confirmation of Plan of Reorganization, and if the District Court be so advised, for purpose of referring matter of said Plan back to the Interstate Commerce Commission for further...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases