1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 49 F.Supp.
  5. 49 F.Supp. 722 (1943)
 

INNIS, SPEIDEN & CO. v. FOOD MACHINERY CORPORATION

No. 1268.

49 F.Supp. 722 (1943)

INNIS, SPEIDEN & CO. et al. v. FOOD MACHINERY CORPORATION (BROGDEX CO. OF CALIFORNIA, Ltd., Intervener).

District Court, D. Delaware.

April 1, 1943.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Herbert L. Cohen and William H. Foulk, both of Wilmington, Del., and Wallace D. Newcomb and Henry N. Paul (of Paul & Paul), both of Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiffs.

James R. Morford (of Marvel & Morford), of Wilmington, Del., and Roy F. Steward, of New York City, for Brogdex Co. of California, intervener.

E. Ennalls Berl, of Wilmington, Del., Charles M. Thomas, of Washington, D. C., Leonard S. Lyon and Richard F. Lyon, both of Los Angeles, Cal., and Philip A. Minnis, of San Jose, Cal., for defendant.

BIGGS, Circuit Judge.

This is a suit for the infringement of United States Patent No. 1,943,468, granted to Walter A. Bridgeman and John Alan Schade on January 16, 1934, for a "Wax Emulsion Coating, and Coating Process". Innis, Speiden & Company is the owner of the patent and Franklin Research Company is an exclusive licensee under an agreement dated April 2, 1937. The intervener, Brogdex Company of California, Ltd., was permitted to come into the suit by reason...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases