1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 139 F.2d
  5. 139 F.2d 603 (1943)
 

MISHAWAKA RUBBER & W. MFG. CO. v. PAINE & WILLIAMS CO.

No. 9494.

139 F.2d 603 (1943)

MISHAWAKA RUBBER & WOOLEN MFG. CO. v. PAINE & WILLIAMS CO.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

December 6, 1943.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Herbert L. Shepard, of Chicago, Ill. (Eugene M. Giles and Herbert L. Shepard, both of Chicago, Ill., and William E. Chilton, of Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for appellant.

William R. Day and John F. Oberlin, both of Cleveland, Ohio (Oberlin, Limbach & Day, John F. Oberlin, and William R. Day, all of Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for appellee.

Before ALLEN, HAMILTON, and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

MARTIN, Circuit Judge.

The controversy presented here originated in the United States Patent Office. In interference proceedings there, the Examiner of Interferences was affirmed by the Patent Office Board of Appeals in his holding that Blair and Schott, assignors of appellant Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Manufacturing Company, had established priority of invention with respect to nine article claims of their issued Patent No. 2,032,832. Both the Examiner and the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases