ARMOUR & CO. v. BOWLES

No. 96.

139 F.2d 495 (1943)

ARMOUR & CO. v. BOWLES, Price Adm'r.

United States Emergency Court of Appeals.

Decided December 14, 1943.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald R. Richberg, of Washington, D. C., and George E. Leonard, Jr., of Chicago, Ill., for complainant.

Jacob D. Hyman, Atty., Henry M. Hart, Jr., Acting Gen. Counsel, Nathaniel L. Nathanson, Associate Gen. Counsel, Carl H. Fulda, Atty., and John J. Downey, Jr., Atty., all of the Office of Price Administration, all of Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before MARIS, Chief Judge, and MAGRUDER and LAWS, Judges.


Heard at New York City December 2, 1943.

PER CURIAM.

The earlier history of this case is set forth in our opinion in Armour & Co. v. Brown, 1943, 137 F.2d 233, 240. Upon consideration of the record then before us and the conceded facts, we were unable to understand how the reasons advanced by the Administrator for denying the protests had any relevance to the issue of fact properly presented under the adjustment provision...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases