UNITED STATES v. AUDITORIUM CONDITIONING CORPORATION


52 F.Supp. 528 (1943)

UNITED STATES v. AUDITORIUM CONDITIONING CORPORATION et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

November 22, 1943.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence S. Apsey, Sp. Asst. to the Atty. Gen., and Harold Lasser, of Newark, N. J., and John S. James and Mervin C. Pollak, both of New York City, Sp. Attys., for plaintiff.

Robert B. Knowles and S. L. Chess, both of New York City, for defendants Ross Industries Corporation and others.

Putney, Twombly & Hall, of New York City, for defendants Carrier Corporation and E. Cloud Wampler.

Reynolds, Richards & McCutcheon, of New York City, for defendants York Ice Machinery Corporation and Stewart E. Lauer.

Sullivan & Cromwell, of New York City, for defendants American Blower Corporation and Clark T. Moore.

Harold L. Herzstein, of New York City, for defendants Auditorium Conditioning Corporation and Benjamin R. Newcomb.


CONGER, District Judge.

Motion by the plaintiff for the appointment of a receiver pendente lite to take possession of, manage and control all of the property and assets of the defendant Auditorium Conditioning Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Auditorium).

The action has been brought by the government to obtain a decree dissolving the defendant Auditorium on the ground that it operated an illegal patent pool in violation of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases