LEE RUBBER & TIRE CORP. v. UNITED STATES

Civ. No. 2709.

49 F.Supp. 6 (1943)

LEE RUBBER & TIRE CORP. v. UNITED STATES.

District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

February 26, 1943.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James A. Montgomery, Jr., and Clement J. Clarke, Jr. (of Pepper, Bodine, Stokes & Schoch), both of Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Frederic G. Rita, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Andrew D. Sharpe, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., Gerald A. Gleeson, U. S. Atty. and Thomas J. Curtin, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.


BARD, District Judge.

This is an action for a refund of floor stocks taxes on cotton fabric owned by plaintiff on August 1, 1933. I make the following special findings of fact:

1. Plaintiff is engaged principally in the manufacture and sale of automobile tires, a constituent part of which is cotton fabric.

2. On August 1, 1933 plaintiff was the owner of 543,441 pounds of cotton fabric on which it paid a tax of $24,029.06 under the floor stocks tax...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases