EICHER, Chief Justice District Court.
This controversy arises out of a contract entered into by the parties in March 1934, whereby appellee undertook to superintend the construction of a sewer in North East Washington, for which a contract had been awarded to the appellant by the District of Columbia Government.
Appellant agreed to provide all the necessary capital and was to receive all profits up to 5¾%, except that if the profits did not exceed 5&...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.