ARMOUR & CO. OF DELAWARE v. BROWN

Nos. 26-28.

137 F.2d 233 (1943)

ARMOUR & CO. OF DELAWARE v. BROWN, Price Adm'r.

United States Emergency Court of Appeals.

Decided August 6, 1943.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald R. Richberg, of Chicago, Ill. (George E. Leonard, Jr., of Chicago, Ill., on the brief), for complainant.

William R. Ming, Jr., of Washington, D. C. (George J. Burke, Gen. Counsel, Thomas I. Emerson, Associate Gen. Counsel, Nathaniel L. Nathanson, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Carl H. Fulda and Henry S. Sellin, Attys., Office of Price Administration, all of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for respondent.

Before MARIS, Chief Judge, and MAGRUDER and LAWS, Judges.


MAGRUDER, Judge.

In No. 26, Armour & Company claims to be aggrieved by the Price Administrator's order issued February 13, 1943, denying its protest against Order No. 1 under Maximum Price Regulation No. 169, which latter order denied an application by complainant, filed August 18, 1942, seeking adjustment of maximum prices for carcass beef to be delivered to the United States under certain contracts. In No. 27, Armour claims to be aggrieved by an order issued...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases