MESSLER v. UNITED STATES RUBBER CO.

No. 179.

53 F.Supp. 76 (1943)

MESSLER v. UNITED STATES RUBBER CO.

District Court, D. Connecticut.

August 5, 1943.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nathaniel Frucht, of Providence, R. I., and Rockwell & Bartholow, of New Haven, Conn., for plaintiff.

Newton A. Burgess and Gifford, Scull & Burgess, all of New York City, for defendant.


SMITH, District Judge.

The defendant has filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground that the patent in suit is void because the plaintiff has unduly delayed in filing a disclaimer of Claim 2 of the patent in suit or in relitigating Claim 2, held invalid in Civil Action No. 1156, United States District Court, District of Massachusetts. The present action was filed October 19, 1939. A bill of particulars was served January 6, 1940, designating Claims 3 to 6 as...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases