UNITED STATES v. HENDRICK


52 F.Supp. 60 (1943)

UNITED STATES ex rel. BENJAMIN v. HENDRICK et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

October 7, 1943.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Julian C. Trupin, of New York City, for plaintiffs.

John J. Manning, of New York City, for defendant Socony-Vacuum Oil Co., Inc.

Frueauff, Burns & Ruch, of New York City, for defendant Cities Service Oil Co.

Chadbourne, Wallace, Parke & Whiteside, of New York City, for defendant Barber Asphalt Corporation.

Dorsey, Adams & Walker, of New York City, for defendant General Builders Supply Corporation.

S. A. L. Morgan, of Amarillo, Tex., for defendant Texas Co.


RIFKIND, District Judge.

This is a motion by the defendants for an order dismissing the action and complaint upon the stated grounds that (a) the plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and (b) plaintiff is without legal capacity to sue.

The action, commonly known as an informer's or "qui tam" action, was instituted by the relator on May 24, 1943, under Sections 5438, 3490, 3491, 3492...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases