INTERWOVEN STOCKING CO. v. UNITED STATES

No. C-1512.

52 F.Supp. 966 (1943)

INTERWOVEN STOCKING CO. v. UNITED STATES.

District Court, D. New Jersey.

October 28, 1943.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Remsen Cowenhoven, of New Brunswick, N.J. (Kirlin, Campbell, Hickox, Keating & McGrann by A. Maurice Fridlund, all of New York City, and C. S. Cunningham, of Ossining, N. Y., of counsel), for plaintiff.

Charles M. Phillips, U. S. Atty., by B. Thorn Lord, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Trenton, N.J., and Frederick G. Rita, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., for defendant.


FORMAN, District Judge.

This action is to recover cotton floor stock taxes exacted under the Agricultural Adjustment Act, which was held to be unconstitutional in United States v. Butler, 297 U.S. 1, 56 S.Ct. 312, 80 L.Ed. 477, 102 A.L.R. 914.

The procedure by which application may be made for refunds of processing and floor stock taxes imposed under the Agricultural Adjustment Act is set out in 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Acts, pages...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases