1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 46 F.Supp.
  5. 46 F.Supp. 48 (1942)
 

RITHOLZ v. BAILEY

No. L. R. 160.

46 F.Supp. 48 (1942)

RITHOLZ et al. v. BAILEY et al.

District Court, E. D. Arkansas, W. D.

June 22, 1942.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bert B. Larey, of Texarkana, Ark., and Frankel & Frankel, of Little Rock, Ark., for plaintiffs.

House, Moses & Holmes (Eugene Warren appearing), and Lee Cazort, Jr., all of Little Rock, Ark., for defendants.

Before WOODROUGH, Circuit Judge, and TRIMBLE, and LEMLEY, District Judges.

TRIMBLE, District Judge.

Findings of Fact.

Upon consideration of the evidence the court finds the facts:

1 That the business carried on by plaintiffs in Arkansas has been derived and is dependent upon its advertising upon which it has expended large sums.

2 That the plaintiffs are residents and citizens of the State of Illinois and the defendants are residents and citizens of the State of Arkansas and that the matter in controversy exceeds...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases