PUERTO RICO v. RUSSELL & CO.

No. 95.

315 U.S. 610 (1942)

PUERTO RICO v. RUSSELL & CO., S. EN C.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided March 16, 1942.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. William Cattron Rigby, with whom Messrs. George A. Malcolm, Attorney General of Puerto Rico, and Nathan R. Margold were on the brief, for petitioner.

Mr. George M. Wolfson for respondent.


MR. JUSTICE ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.

The question for decision is whether a statute of Puerto Rico impairs the obligation of certain contracts in violation of the Island's organic law.1

The respondent's predecessor in title, Fortuna Estates, as owner or lessee of lands adjacent to the Jacaguas River, enjoyed under Spanish law, and respondent, as successor, still enjoys, rights appurtenant to the lands to draw...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases