1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 129 F.2d
  5. 129 F.2d 651 (1942)
 

CONNECTICUT IMPORTING CO. v. CONTINENTAL D. CORPORATION

No. 235.

129 F.2d 651 (1942)

CONNECTICUT IMPORTING CO. v. CONTINENTAL DISTILLING CORPORATION et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

July 16, 1942.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond E. Hackett, of Stamford, Conn. (Mark W. Norman, of Stamford, Conn., Earl Jay Gratz, of Philadelphia, Pa., and Walter B. Lockwood, of Stamford, Conn., of counsel), for defendant-appellant Continental Distilling Corporation.

Abraham S. Weissman and Charles Henchel, both of New Haven, Conn., for defendant-appellant A. Sherman Mfg. Co., Inc.

Arthur Klein and Robert J. Woodruff, both of New Haven, Conn. (David S. Day and Norman K. Parsells, both of Bridgeport, Conn., of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee Connecticut Importing Co.

Before L. HAND, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.

AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge.

This is an action to recover treble damages, brought under Section 7 of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. 15 U.S.C.A. § 15 note. The violations of the act set forth in the complaint and in plaintiff's proof consisted of a conspiracy between Continental Distilling Corporation and the other defendants named in the complaint, as well as Austin-Nichols and McKesson & Robbins, to control wholesale and retail prices on the liquor products...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases