YOUNG v. KEELING

No. 10367.

130 F.2d 560 (1942)

YOUNG v. KEELING.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

July 31, 1942.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ike Young, in pro. per.

No attorney for respondent.

Before SIBLEY, HUTCHESON, and HOLMES, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

Ike Young petitions us for a writ of mandamus against the Judge of the District Court to require him to "perform his official duty to petitioner and file petitioner's motion for new trial on newly discovered evidence in accordance with the established law for capital cases." It appears that petitioner, after adjournment of the term, sent his motion for a new trial directly to the Judge, and not to the Clerk, and the Judge has declined to take any action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases