PADWAY v. PACIFIC MUT. LIFE INS. CO. OF CALIFORNIA

No. 306.

42 F.Supp. 569 (1942)

PADWAY v. PACIFIC MUT. LIFE INS. CO. OF CALIFORNIA et al.

District Court, E. D. Wisconsin.

January 21, 1942.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Padway, Goldberg & Tarrell, of Milwaukee, Wis. (H. S. Winnecour, of Milwaukee, Wis., of counsel), for plaintiff.

Lamfrom, Tighe, Engelhard & Peck, of Milwaukee, Wis., for defendants.


STONE, District Judge.

The defendants have moved for a summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U. S.C.A. following section 723c, on the basis of material facts admitted by plaintiff.

Plaintiff contends that on July 22, 1936, he was the holder of two non-cancellable income policies, referred to herein as "non-can" policies, which had been issued to him by the defendant, the Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases