MACHER v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

No. 167.

126 F.2d 420 (1942)

MACHER et al. v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

February 26, 1942.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward E. Reichman, of New York City (Carb, Reichman & Luria and Sydney A. Luria, all of New York City, on the brief), for petitioners.

Joseph J. Smith, Jr., Asst. Chief Counsel, of Washington, D. C. (W. T. Kelley, Chief Counsel, and W. T. Chantland, James W. Nichol, and R. E. Schrimsher, Sp. Attys., all of Washington, D. C.), for respondent.

Before SWAN, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and C. E. CLARK, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

Notwithstanding their claims in the petition to review, petitioners do not directly attack the Commission's basic finding — supported by quite credible testimony — that they had persisted in advertising themselves in catalogues, circulars, and customers' discount cards as wholesalers of jewelry, selling at wholesale prices, whereas actually their business and prices were retail. An order must therefore issue; and we are not disposed to make...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases