1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 46 F.Supp.
  5. 46 F.Supp. 487 (1942)
 

HANSON-VAN WINKLE-MUNNING CO. v. U. S. G. & P. EQUIP. CORP.

No. 2881.

46 F.Supp. 487 (1942)

HANSON-VAN WINKLE-MUNNING CO. v. U. S. GALVANIZING & PLATING EQUIPMENT CORPORATION et al.

District Court, N. D. New York.

September 8, 1942.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Miller, Hubbell & Evans, of Utica, N. Y., and Toulmin & Toulmin, of Dayton, Ohio (Rowan A. Greer, of Dayton, Ohio, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Ferris, Burgess, Hughes & Dorrance, of Utica, N. Y., and Edwards, Bower & Pool, of New York City (Clifton V. Edwards, Frank A. Bower, Reverdy Johnson, and Harmon S. Potter, all of New York City, of counsel), for U. S. Galvanizing & Plating Equipment Corporation.

Arthur S. Evans, of Rome, N. Y., for Revere Copper & Brass, Inc.

BRYANT, District Judge.

This is an action for infringement of Claim 8 of Letters Patent No. 1,501,946 and Claims 1 and 7, inclusive, of Patent No. 1,896,097. Both patents, referred to as the "Hall" Patents, are for an electroplating apparatus or automatic conveyor for chemical or electro-chemical operations.

Plaintiff, a New Jersey corporation, through assignment, is the owner of both patents. Defendant U. S. Galvanizing & Plating Equipment Corporation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases