1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 130 F.2d
  5. 130 F.2d 344 (1942)
 

HAZELTINE CORPORATION v. CROSLEY CORPORATION

No. 9096.

130 F.2d 344 (1942)

HAZELTINE CORPORATION v. CROSLEY CORPORATION.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

August 28, 1942.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Laurence B. Dodds and Henry T. Kilburn, both of New York City (Paxton & Seasongood and Robert P. Goldman, all of Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief), for appellant.

Samuel E. Darby, Jr., of New York City (Allen & Allen, of Cincinnati, Ohio, Floyd H. Crews, of New York City, and Alden D. Redfield, of Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief), for appellee.

Before ALLEN, MARTIN, and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.

MARTIN, Circuit Judge.

The bill of complaint charging infringement of MacDonald Patents, Nos. 1,913,604 and 2,022,514, owned by appellant, was dismissed in the district court on the ground that the patents were not infringed. Decision on the issue of the validity of the patent claims was pretermitted.

The patents, relating to vacuum tube radio receivers, describe a wave signaling system; and the invention, as defined by appellant, provides an antenna primary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases