MERCO NORDSTROM VALVE CO. v. W. M. ACKER ORGANIZATION

No. 8997.

131 F.2d 277 (1942)

MERCO NORDSTROM VALVE CO. v. W. M. ACKER ORGANIZATION, Inc., et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied December 10, 1942.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

F. O. Richey, of Cleveland, Ohio (F. O. Richey, of Cleveland, Ohio, William A. Strauch, of Washington, D. C., Lewis D. Konigsford, of Pittsburgh, Pa., Strauch & Hoffman, of Washington, D. C., and Richey & Watts, of Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for appellant.

Hugh M. Morris, of Wilmington, Del., (Hugh M. Morris, of Wilmington, Del., Donald U. Rich, of New York City, Alexander L. Nichols, of Wilmington, Del., and Kwis, Hudson & Kent, of Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for appellee.

Before HICKS, SIMONS, and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.


HICKS, Circuit Judge.

Suit by appellant for infringement of Claims 6, 7 and 8 of Reissue Patent No. 17,375, herein called No. 75, July 16, 1929, to Nordstrom for a "Valve"; and of Claims 13 and 14 of Patent No. 2,012,578, herein called No. 78, August 27, 1935, also to Nordstrom for a "Valve." The defenses were invalidity and noninfringement.

In its findings of fact and conclusions of law, the court limited the claims substantially to the disclosures of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases